The doer and the thinker, no allowance for the other – Gerald “Little Milton” Bostock
A disinterested observer might conclude that there have been two Donald Trumps. There is the doer, someone who had some significant accomplishments during his Presidency. Some good, some bad; they were concrete actions attached to reality, and generally of a practical, transactional form that didn’t stray outside the normal lanes of American politics. History will be the ultimate judge of those actions.
Then there is the thinker. Herein we find the man who gibbered endlessly on Twitter, who spouted half-truths and outright lies with total conviction, who presented as a carnival barker and pro-wrestling trash talker, whipping up his followers into fervency and frenzy, who engineered a highly unlikely victory in 2016… and who ultimately fell prey to his own hype. Herein was the man of dubious character and thin skin, who engendered a loathing far in excess of what his policies might otherwise have prompted.
Some loved his boorish and in-your-face manner, figuring that the lizards in DC are even worse people who hide behind more genteel veneers while they do unto the populace. And, after a fashion, they’ve got a point. Trump was a giant eye poke to the DC machine, and a deserved one at that. It’s also the case that this low character wasn’t exactly unique in Presidential history. Trump’s outwardly head-and-shoulders worse than his predecessors in this, but that doesn’t exactly make LBJ or Nixon or Jackson or Buchanan or Wilson or FDR moral stalwarts.
If, two or three weeks ago, after exhausting the myriad legal options available to him for challenging the electoral outcome, Trump had admitted defeat, and accepted the loss with ‘the people have spoken and it’s time to move on,’ he’d have retained that “low character” title while remaining within the normal bounds of the Presidency, no matter the histrionics that have accompanied his term. His successes and his failures would have been matters of routine history, after the hot tempers of both his supporters and his detractors cooled with time.
All but for one epic failure.
The lore of the Lord of the Rings begins with the forging of twenty rings. Three for the Elves, seven for the Dwarves, and nine for the Men, all ruled by the One Ring. That One Ring corrupted the others.
Similarly, Trump’s one failure: his refusal to accept his loss, coupled with his continued Big Lie assertion that the election was stolen despite an endless string of failures to make a case compelling enough for the courts to consider, has corrupted the entirety of his Presidency, thanks to a riot at the Capitol that was born of his inflammatory rhetoric and a successful inculcation into his followers of the ‘stolen election’ fantasy.
This failure will corrupt everything he did, including his successes in the Middle East, on tax policy, and on deregulation. It’ll also provoke contrarian responses in the wrong places, including China and Iran. Worst of all, it’ll give the Democrats, whose agenda was already shaping up to be rather abysmal, ample reason to ignore any message of moderation from this past election (and that message was clear. They lost 11 seats in the House, and would have not reached even their 50-50 split in the Senate were it not for Trump’s antics).
Trump’s failure here will resonate forward, with a “guilt-by-association” dismissal of all that the Republicans (even those who rejected Trump’s Big Lie) say and put forth, and all that the 74 million who voted for him (even those who accepted the results without squabble) want from government.
Some are using the Democrats’ plans as an excuse to keep screaming about the election, as if “they’re going to ruin the country” predictions are a legitimate excuse to tear it down. They need to stop.
Unfortunately, many won’t, at least based on my social media feeds. This is the other lasting effect of Trump’s failure: continued polarization and rancor. Lefties and Never-Trumpers are beating their chests and demanding that his supporters bow and scrape, and that those who had a mixed view eat a bushel of crow. Trumpists are Rambo-ing “It’s not over!” at anyone who’ll listen and many who won’t.
All because Trump spun a cocoon of delusion for himself and his cultists, and refused to allow it to be opened to the light of day. The “good rings” he forged, the record he built, and any hope of a legacy that runs counter to the MSM’s and Left’s wild hatred are forever debased by the storming of the Capitol by a passel of his true-believers.
It really didn’t have to be this way. Even after the barricades were breached, he could have salvaged it all. That he chose not to is no surprise, sad to say.
Yeah Trump is his own worst enemy, seeing any defeat as a weakness he can’t admit to them. (he also couldn’t let any attack however minor go unanswered with overwhelming rhetoric) you are right the capitol riots have given the Democrats the magic bullet to take down Trump, and when they do they will go after everyone associated with him and those who weren’t. this is in my opinion why so many Republican are jumping ship, they want to be able to claim in the “trials” to come, that they weren’t really with him. It won’t matter the Democrats will claim that all Republicans are tainted by Trump (yes even the never Trumpers) This is why they want to Impeach him now, so they can get Republicans on record as being opposed to impeachment and thus they can say they were for the riots. They’ll extend this association into the next (and future) legislation smearing those who oppose it are Trump associates.
Even those that roll over today and go along with the Democrat’s agenda will be attacked as Trump Acollates in the next election. Sadly I’m not seeing any defence that will work against this attack. then again I do think the Democrats will try and over reach on their agenda, which may open the window a crack for a Republican comeback. If only Trump goes away.
I agree – the path to comeback will be in the Dems’ overreach. They’re going to pretend to a progressive mandate based solely on the Trump-ugliness, and they’ll prompt a pushback in the mid-terms.
Happened in 1994, happened in 2010. It can happen again.
People have short political memories, and put more emphasis on “the here and now” than on the past.
So, is it wrong to refuse to submit to a stolen election? There is ample evidence that it was stolen. Submission to such blatant fraud guarantees that similar fraud will happen in future elections. The Republic itself is at stake. If the Democrats can engage in blatant fraud with impunity, we will no longer be a Republic of The People. We will be ruled by usurpers.
Now keep in mind, I am of a similar mine to you. He did some very good things. And yet, he did some really rash things. He was a crass jerk. All through his term of office, I really wanted someone to step in and filter his Twitter account.
I cannot fault him for refusing to step aside amidst the preponderance of evidence of sufficient fraud to turn the election.
Preponderance of evidence deemed insufficient for consideration by 60 different courts?